🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a rising number of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation may be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to pass a law increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised guardians to prevent their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is given. While it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," stated a leading MEP driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Last year, interest grew behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. One foundation founded by the family of a young person who took her own life after viewing harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to build products and services that are safe and fit for children," commented a prominent peer.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the regional level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule capping minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various individuals to mimic this lead, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of the West, other states are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, global bodies adopt a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global debate evolves, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that states internationally are less and less prepared to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.